I help you automate the repetitive work that eats ten or more hours a week. Your senior people get those hours back for the work only they can do. Your firm's methods and your clients' data stay confidential.
A summary that invents a number, or a citation that points nowhere, becomes your error the moment you sign.
They took years to build, and they're why clients pay your rate. They live in your templates, checklists and past reports, and the wrong tool can keep a copy of all three.
Client files arrive under a confidentiality clause, so you need to be able to say in writing where they go and what's kept.
Each of those has a good answer, and it's decided by how the tools are set up: where the knowledge sits, what leaves your environment, what gets retained, and what never touches a public model.
You get those answers settled, in writing, before anything gets built. Then the repetitive work that eats your senior hours gets automated inside your firm: the reading, the comparing, the checking, and the admin around every deliverable. Documents are the example on this page. The same approach fits any process in a firm of 10 to 30 people where a named professional signs the result.
Your documents are usually the place to start, because that's where the senior hours go. Your intake, scheduling, reporting and billing follow the same pattern. Here's the document version.
Point it at a data room, a document set, or a pile of third-party reports and get back a grounded summary, with every point cited to its source page.
Check a new project against everything you've seen before. Figures go into a fixed format, and every number traces to where it came from.
Run a draft against the standard before it goes out: missing citations, numbers that don't match between the table and the summary, claims with nothing behind them. You get a findings list, not a rewrite.
The model reads, drafts and flags. It never does the arithmetic.
The sample has four claims and the table they rely on. Press the button and the page adds up the table in code and stamps each claim. Change a figure in the table and run it again.
Total capital cost is estimated at $48.2 million (Table 1).1 Site works account for $6.4 million of the total.2 Contingency is set at 10% of direct costs (Table 1).3 The schedule is achievable within 30 months.4
| Item | $ million |
|---|---|
| Site works | |
| Structure | |
| Mechanical and electrical | |
| Fit-out | |
| Contingency | |
| Direct costs are every line except contingency. | |
The arithmetic runs in this page's code. No model is involved.
Press "Run the check" to stamp each claim.
Claim 1The sentence says $48.2 million; the table adds up to $46.9 million.
Claim 2Matches: the table shows $6.4 million. The sentence doesn't cite a source.
Claim 3Matches: $4.3 million is 10.1% of $42.6 million. Cites Table 1.
Claim 4No figure in the table covers this. A person has to confirm it.
They apply from the first conversation, whether or not we end up working together.
David Martin, Martin Digital Consulting 
I'm David Martin. I spent a decade at Orange, where I helped scale its fiber internet service, and I've advised startups on go-to-market since 2013. I've lived and worked in Switzerland, Taiwan, China and France.
Right now I'm working with a few consulting firms in the mining industry, where the technical reports carry a Qualified Person's signature. Anything I build for a firm like that has to hold up when someone puts their name on the result.
My AI clients are confidential, which is the point of the work. References are shared privately, with each client's permission, once we've talked.
Every engagement is quoted in writing before work begins.
AI for people who are accountable for what they say.
If that's you, tell me about your firm, or send me a note.
